Is blended e-learning as measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high school students?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21810/.v1i2.47Keywords:
Blended e-learning, learning performance, electrical machineryAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of blended e-learning on electrical machinery performance (achievement test and self-assessment). Participants were two classes of 11th graders majoring in electrical engineering and taking the electrical machinery class at a vocational high school in Taiwan. The participants were randomly selected and assigned to either the experimental group (n = 33) which studied through blended e-learning or the control group (n = 32) which studied through traditional classroom learning. The experiment lasted for five weeks. The results showed that (a) there were no significant differences in achievement test scores between blended e-learning and traditional learning; (b) students in the experimental group obtained significantly higher scores on self-assessment than students in the control group; (c) students’ scores on self-assessment were significantly higher after studying through blended e-learning than before. Overall, blended e-learning did not significantly affect students’ achievement test scores, but significantly affected their self-assessment scores.
References
Allen, N. (2010). A cover to cover solution: How open textbooks are the path to textbook affordability. The Student Public Interest Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.studentpirgs.org/sites/student/files/reports/A-Cover-To-Cover-Solution_4.pdf
Bailey, T., Jenkins, D., & Leinbach, T. (2005). What we know about community college low-income and minority student outcomes: Descriptive statistics from National Surveys. Community College Research Center.
Baker, J., Thierstein, J., Fletcher, K., Kaur, M., & Emmons, J. (2009). Open textbook proof-of-concept via Connexions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).
Baumol, W. J. (1996). Children of performing arts, the economic dilemma: The climbing costs of health care and education. Journal of Cultural Economics, 20(3), 183-206.
Berry, T., Cook, L., Hill, N., & Stevens, K. (2010). An exploratory analysis of textbook usage and study habits: Misperceptions and barriers to success. College Teaching, 59(1), 31-39.
Bissell, A. (2009). Permission granted: Open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning, The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24, 97-106.
Buczynski, J. A. (2007). Faculty begin to replace textbooks with freely accessible online resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 169-179.
Carbaugh, R., & Koushik G. (2005). Are college textbooks priced fairly? Challenge, 48(5) 95-112.
Caswell, T. (2012). The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies (pp. 259-262). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/GameChangersEducationandInform/CaseStudy2TheOpenCourseLibrary/250347.
D’Antoni, S. (2009). Open educational resources: Reviewing initiatives and issues. Open Learning, The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24, 3-10.
Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29-44.
Fleming, C., & Massey, M. (2007). Jorum open educational resources report. Retrieved from www.jorum.ac.uk/docs/pdf/0707_JorumOERreportFinal.pdf
Goodwin, M. A. L. (2011). The Open Course Library: Using open educational resources to improve community college access (Doctoral dissertation). Washington State University.
Hewlett (2013). Open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/programs/education-program/open-educational-resources
Hilton, J., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1523.
Hilton, J., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning, 27(3), 265-272.
Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2011). Open-access textbooks and financial sustainability: A case study on Flat World Knowledge. The International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning, 12(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/960/1860
Johnstone, S. M. (2006). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Quarterly, 28(3), 15.
McKerlich R., Ives, C., & McGreal, R. (2013). Measuring use and creation of open educational resources in higher education. The International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1573/2637.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). http://nces.ed.gov/.
Privateer, P. M. (1999). Academic technology and the future of higher education: Strategic paths taken and not taken. Journal of Higher Education, 60-79.
Provasnik, S., & Planty, M. (2008). Community colleges: Special supplement to The Condition of Education 2008: Statistical anaylsis report, August 2008.
Ravid, G., Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2008). Wikibooks in higher education: Empowerment through online distributed collaboration. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1913-1928.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2012). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education.
Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 2-5.
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/iiep/eng/focus/opensrc/PDF/OERForumFinalReport.pdf
U.S. Government Accountability Organization. (2005, July). College textbooks: Enhanced offerings appear to drive recent price increases (Publication No. GAO-05-806). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05806.pdf.
Wiley, D., Hilton, J., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in high school science classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This is the journal's copyright notice, drawn from Distribution Settings.
